Choosing between RESTful APIs and GraphQL is a critical decision in backend development that affects how your server communicates with clients, handles data, and scales over time. This guide focuses on the key differences between RESTful APIs and GraphQL, helping you understand when to choose each for your backend architecture, while maximizing relevance and SEO for those searching this topic.

Pricing Resources Case Studies Blog Examples Contact

Blog

RESTful APIs vs. GraphQL: Key Differences in Backend Development and When to Choose Each

Choosing between RESTful APIs and GraphQL is a critical decision in backend development that affects how your server communicates with clients, handles data, and scales over time. This guide focuses on the key differences between RESTful APIs and GraphQL, helping you understand when to choose each for your backend architecture, while maximizing relevance and SEO for those searching this topic.

What is REST?

REST (Representational State Transfer) is an architectural style that exposes resources via multiple endpoints, using standard HTTP methods like GET, POST, PUT, DELETE, and PATCH. It is widely adopted due to its simplicity and reliance on HTTP standards.

Key REST Characteristics:

Resource-Oriented Endpoints: URLs represent resources, e.g., /users/123, /products/456.
Statelessness: Each HTTP request is independent and contains all information needed for processing.
Multiple Endpoints: Different URLs for distinct resources or actions.
Use of HTTP Verbs: Defines operations based on verbs like GET to fetch, POST to create, etc.
Cacheable Responses: Leveraging HTTP caching to improve performance.
Versioning: Commonly managed by URL versioning, e.g., /v1/users, which can lead to maintenance overhead.

What is GraphQL?

GraphQL is a query language and runtime that allows clients to specify exactly what data they need, with all interactions happening through a single endpoint (commonly /graphql). Developed by Facebook and publicly released in 2015, GraphQL is designed to address some limitations of REST.

Key GraphQL Features:

Single Endpoint: All queries and mutations through /graphql.
Client-Driven Queries: Clients define precise data requirements, enabling nested and related data fetching in a single request.
Strongly Typed Schema: Clearly defines the data types, available queries, mutations, and subscriptions.
Real-Time Support: Native support for subscriptions allows real-time updates.
Schema Introspection: Allows clients and IDE tools to discover API capabilities dynamically.
No Versioning: Schema evolves via additive changes, reducing breaking changes.

1. Data Fetching and Manipulation Differences

REST:

REST APIs require multiple HTTP requests to fetch related or nested data. For example, to get a user’s details and their posts:

GET /users/123
GET /users/123/posts

This can lead to overfetching, where clients receive more data than needed, or underfetching, requiring multiple requests to retrieve complete datasets.

GraphQL:

GraphQL enables clients to request exactly what they need in a single query, including nested related data. For example:

{
  user(id: "123") {
    id
    name
    posts {
      id
      title
      comments {
        id
        content
      }
    }
  }
}

This eliminates multiple round trips, reducing latency and bandwidth usage.

2. Overfetching and Underfetching

REST APIs often return fixed data structures leading to overfetching (extra unwanted data) or underfetching (missing needed nested data).
GraphQL solves these problems by allowing precise queries which prevent overfetching and underfetching, optimizing data transfer and improving frontend responsiveness.

3. API Evolution and Versioning

REST typically requires versioning (e.g., /v1/, /v2/ endpoints) to introduce breaking changes or new features, which can complicate maintenance.
GraphQL supports schema evolution without versioning by adding new fields and types while keeping existing ones stable, enabling backward compatibility.

4. Tooling and Discoverability

REST benefits from tools like OpenAPI and Postman but lacks dynamic schema introspection.
GraphQL offers powerful introspection APIs, enabling tools like GraphiQL and Apollo Studio, which provide autocomplete, real-time API exploration, and validation.

5. Performance Considerations

REST can experience performance issues when multiple network calls are needed to gather nested data, but benefits from straightforward HTTP caching headers.
GraphQL reduces network round trips by aggregating data into one request but can encounter performance bottlenecks due to complex queries requiring expensive resolver computations. Intelligent query complexity limiting and caching strategies (e.g., persisted queries) are essential.

6. Learning Curve and Complexity

REST APIs are generally easier to implement and understand, benefiting from widespread adoption and tooling support.
GraphQL requires learning its query language, schema design, and resolver functions, which introduces a higher initial complexity but provides flexible, powerful APIs.

7. Real-Time Data via Subscriptions

REST does not natively support real-time data; it relies on WebSockets, Server-Sent Events (SSE), or polling.
GraphQL includes built-in support for subscriptions, enabling real-time data updates through the same GraphQL endpoint.

8. Error Handling

REST leverages HTTP status codes (e.g., 200, 404, 500) for success and errors, which aligns well with existing HTTP client behavior.
GraphQL always returns a 200 status if the request hits the server, with errors detailed in the response body, requiring additional client-side parsing logic.

9. Security Considerations

Both REST and GraphQL require robust security measures:

REST benefits from well-established practices like API keys, OAuth, JWT, and HTTPS.
GraphQL poses unique risks due to complex queries causing denial-of-service (DoS). Mitigation strategies include rate limiting, query depth limiting, persisted queries, and careful schema design.

When to Choose RESTful APIs

Choose REST if:

Your API mainly performs basic CRUD operations with clear, resource-based boundaries.
You want simplicity and lower initial learning curve.
You require strong HTTP caching with standardized status codes.
You prefer mature ecosystem support and wide compatibility.
Your data relationships are simple and do not necessitate nested querying.
You manage a stable API with infrequent changes.

When to Choose GraphQL

Choose GraphQL if:

Your application requires complex, nested, or relational data fetching with minimal requests.
Frontend teams need rapid iteration and query flexibility without backend deployments.
You want to optimize for mobile clients or limited bandwidth environments.
You are developing real-time features using subscriptions.
You want self-documenting APIs via schema introspection and rich developer tools.
Your project demands a single endpoint consolidating data from multiple sources (Backend for Frontend pattern).

Real-World Examples

GitHub API v4: Uses GraphQL to allow selective, nested data fetching.
Twitter API v1: Uses RESTful endpoints with resource-based URLs.
Shopify: Combines GraphQL for flexible ecommerce data and REST for legacy support.
Zigpoll.io: Implements both REST and GraphQL APIs, catering to complex polling and survey app needs.

Summary Table: REST vs GraphQL

Aspect	REST	GraphQL
API Endpoint	Multiple per resource	Single unified endpoint
Data Fetching	Fixed data structure	Client-defined queries
Over/Underfetching	Common issue	Eliminated
Versioning	URL-based	Schema evolution, no version
Caching	HTTP caching	Complex caching strategies
Learning Curve	Easier, widely adopted	Steeper, query & schema based
Tooling	OpenAPI, Postman	GraphiQL, Apollo Studio
Real-Time Support	External implementations required	Built-in subscriptions
Error Handling	HTTP status codes	Errors in response body
Performance	Multiple requests may impact	Single request, careful optimization needed
Security	Mature tools, standards	Requires query complexity management

Final Thoughts

Both RESTful APIs and GraphQL are powerful tools in backend development. Your choice depends heavily on your project requirements:

Use REST when you want simplicity, broad compatibility, and strong caching with well-defined resource boundaries.
Use GraphQL when your client demands precise, nested data fetching and flexible querying with real-time support.

Often, the best approach combines both, using REST for simple, stable resources and GraphQL to provide flexible, client-driven data aggregation.

Learn More and Try Out APIs

Official GraphQL Documentation
RESTful API Tutorial
Postman API Network
Apollo GraphQL
Explore polling and survey solutions with Zigpoll.io, supporting both RESTful and GraphQL integrations.

Mastering these API paradigms will empower your backend systems to be more scalable, performant, and developer-friendly, enabling responsive frontend applications that delight users.