How to Measure the Effectiveness of Cybersecurity Awareness Training in Reducing Phishing Attacks Targeted at Firefighting Personnel

Firefighting departments safeguard communities and critical infrastructure, making them prime targets for increasingly sophisticated phishing attacks. For growth engineers and cybersecurity leaders, the challenge extends beyond delivering awareness training—it lies in accurately measuring its impact on reducing phishing risks among firefighting personnel. Without precise, actionable metrics, validating return on investment and tailoring improvements to strengthen security posture becomes difficult.

This comprehensive guide provides practical, actionable strategies to measure cybersecurity awareness training effectiveness specifically within firefighting organizations. Each approach includes detailed implementation steps, measurement techniques, real-world examples, and expert guidance on integrating Zigpoll’s dynamic feedback platform. By capturing real-time employee insights, Zigpoll transforms raw data into meaningful action that directly supports risk reduction and continuous program enhancement.


1. Conduct Baseline Phishing Simulation Tests Before Training to Establish Vulnerability Benchmarks

Why it matters:
Establishing a baseline phishing susceptibility profile is essential to understanding current vulnerabilities and setting measurable improvement goals. Realistic phishing simulations tailored to firefighting contexts reveal how personnel respond to targeted attack vectors, providing a critical benchmark for evaluating training effectiveness.

Implementation details:

  • Select a phishing simulation tool that supports scenario customization relevant to firefighting roles, such as fake emergency alerts, payroll discrepancies, or equipment maintenance requests.
  • Develop diverse phishing emails incorporating tactics like spear-phishing, urgent notifications, and credential harvesting attempts.
  • Deploy simulations across all personnel, ensuring comprehensive coverage across ranks and shifts.
  • Collect detailed interaction data, including click rates, credential submissions, and phishing reports.

Real-world example:
A metropolitan fire department launched a baseline phishing test featuring simulated urgent equipment recall emails. The test revealed a 35% click-through rate, highlighting critical awareness gaps and informing focused training content.

Measurement methods:

  • Percentage of personnel clicking phishing links or submitting credentials
  • Number and percentage of employees promptly reporting phishing attempts
  • Identification of phishing scenarios with the highest failure rates to prioritize remediation

Tools and resources:

  • Phishing simulation platforms like KnowBe4 or Cofense PhishMe for scenario creation and analytics
  • Internal email monitoring systems for tracking interaction data
  • Zigpoll surveys immediately following simulations to collect employee confidence ratings and qualitative feedback on phishing recognition challenges, enriching quantitative results and enabling targeted follow-up training.

2. Integrate Zigpoll Feedback Forms at Key Training Touchpoints to Capture Real-Time Employee Insights

Why it matters:
Collecting employee perceptions and confidence levels during training provides nuanced insights into content effectiveness and engagement. Real-time feedback highlights areas of confusion or difficulty, allowing agile adjustments that improve understanding and retention.

Implementation details:

  • Embed concise Zigpoll feedback forms at the conclusion of each training module or live session to gather immediate reactions.
  • Design targeted questions such as “How confident are you in identifying phishing emails after this session?” or “Which phishing tactic was most difficult to recognize?”
  • Utilize Zigpoll’s branching logic to explore specific challenges in depth without overwhelming participants.

Real-world example:
A regional firefighting unit used Zigpoll feedback after cybersecurity workshops and discovered that 40% of attendees struggled with identifying spear-phishing emails disguised as messages from supervisors. This insight directly informed a focused refresher module on spear-phishing.

Measurement methods:

  • Quantitative confidence ratings and comprehension scores
  • Qualitative feedback highlighting specific misconceptions or training gaps
  • Feedback form completion and engagement rates to assess participation levels

Tools and resources:

  • Zigpoll’s customizable survey platform for seamless integration and real-time sentiment analysis
  • Learning Management Systems (LMS) capable of embedding external surveys
  • Use Zigpoll data to validate training content relevance and adjust delivery methods, ensuring continuous alignment with personnel needs and improving overall program effectiveness.

3. Track Phishing Susceptibility Trends Over Time with Repeated Simulations to Measure Behavioral Change

Why it matters:
Ongoing measurement of phishing susceptibility reveals behavioral change trajectories and training ROI. Regular simulations help identify personnel or units requiring additional support and validate reinforcement efforts.

Implementation details:

  • Schedule quarterly phishing simulation campaigns with evolving scenarios reflecting emerging threats and seasonal phishing trends.
  • Analyze click-through and reporting rates relative to baseline data to assess progress.
  • Segment results by role, shift, or department to uncover targeted intervention opportunities.

Real-world example:
A fire department reduced phishing click rates from 35% to 12% within six months by combining targeted training with continuous phishing simulations, demonstrating a significant decrease in risk exposure.

Measurement methods:

  • Percentage reduction in phishing click rates over time
  • Increase in phishing email reporting rates
  • Correlation of training attendance with performance improvements

Tools and resources:

  • Advanced phishing simulation tools offering trend analytics and segmentation
  • Zigpoll to supplement simulation data with employee-reported behavioral changes and confidence levels, enabling growth engineers to correlate subjective insights with objective metrics and refine training accordingly
  • Internal dashboards for ongoing performance monitoring

4. Monitor Incident Response Times for Reported Phishing Attempts to Enhance Threat Containment

Why it matters:
Reducing the time between phishing email receipt and incident resolution limits potential damage. Effective training should improve not only detection but also prompt reporting and remediation.

Implementation details:

  • Use IT ticketing or SIEM systems to capture timestamps for phishing email receipt, employee reporting, and remediation actions.
  • Compare response metrics before and after training implementation to quantify improvements.
  • Identify bottlenecks or procedural gaps delaying incident handling and address them promptly.

Real-world example:
Following awareness training, a firefighting department decreased average phishing report-to-remediation time from 48 hours to under 12 hours, enabling faster threat containment.

Measurement methods:

  • Average time from phishing receipt to employee reporting
  • Average remediation time from report to resolution
  • Volume and trend of phishing incidents reported by personnel

Tools and resources:

  • SIEM platforms such as Splunk or IBM QRadar for incident tracking
  • IT service management tools like ServiceNow to manage workflows
  • Deploy Zigpoll quick surveys post-incident to assess employee understanding of reporting processes and identify procedural gaps, ensuring continuous improvement in incident response behaviors.

5. Use Role-Based Phishing Scenarios Tailored to Firefighting Operations for Greater Relevance

Why it matters:
Generic phishing content often lacks relevance, reducing engagement and effectiveness. Tailored scenarios resonate better with firefighting personnel, increasing awareness of realistic threats they face.

Implementation details:

  • Develop simulation scenarios reflecting real-world phishing tactics targeting firefighting roles, such as fake emergency dispatch updates, payroll fraud attempts, or equipment maintenance requests.
  • Customize training modules for administrative staff, field firefighters, and command center teams to address role-specific risks.
  • Regularly update scenarios using threat intelligence and frontline feedback.

Real-world example:
A fire department’s simulation involving fake “incident command system updates” improved command staff’s vigilance, leading to fewer phishing clicks in that group.

Measurement methods:

  • Click and report rates segmented by scenario and role
  • Employee feedback on scenario realism and applicability via Zigpoll surveys
  • Improvement trends in recognizing role-specific phishing attempts

Tools and resources:

  • Phishing simulation platforms supporting scenario customization
  • Collaboration with cybersecurity and firefighting subject matter experts
  • Zigpoll for capturing scenario-specific feedback and suggestions for continuous refinement, ensuring training remains aligned with evolving threats and operational realities.

6. Assess Knowledge Retention Through Periodic Quizzes and Microlearning to Sustain Awareness

Why it matters:
Sustained awareness depends on reinforcing knowledge and identifying retention gaps. Regular quizzes and microlearning modules maintain engagement and support continuous learning, especially during operational peaks.

Implementation details:

  • Deploy brief quizzes immediately after training and at regular intervals (e.g., monthly) via microlearning platforms.
  • Incorporate gamification elements such as badges, leaderboards, and rewards to boost participation.
  • Analyze incorrect responses to pinpoint common misunderstandings and tailor follow-up training.

Real-world example:
A firefighting unit’s monthly microlearning quizzes helped reduce phishing click rates by continuously reinforcing key concepts and maintaining alertness during high-stress periods.

Measurement methods:

  • Quiz pass rates and average scores over time
  • Correlation between quiz participation and phishing simulation outcomes
  • Engagement metrics on microlearning content

Tools and resources:

  • LMS with integrated quiz capabilities
  • Microlearning platforms like Axonify or EdApp
  • Zigpoll for quick learner feedback on quiz difficulty and content relevance, enabling iterative improvement of learning materials.

7. Implement a Phishing Reporting Incentive Program and Measure Participation to Foster a Security Culture

Why it matters:
Encouraging proactive reporting strengthens threat detection and fosters a security-conscious culture. Incentives motivate personnel to participate actively in phishing defense.

Implementation details:

  • Design an incentive program recognizing employees who report phishing emails, using rewards such as public acknowledgment, certificates, or small prizes.
  • Track the number and accuracy of phishing reports submitted.
  • Share success stories and impact metrics regularly to sustain motivation.

Real-world example:
A fire department’s “Phish Catcher” program increased phishing reports by 300%, enabling faster threat isolation and reducing successful attacks.

Measurement methods:

  • Monthly volume of phishing reports submitted
  • Ratio of valid phishing reports to false positives
  • Relationship between reporting rates and phishing incident trends

Tools and resources:

  • Integrated email reporting tools linked to security platforms
  • Communication channels like Slack or Microsoft Teams for recognition and updates
  • Use Zigpoll surveys to assess program effectiveness and gather employee suggestions, ensuring the incentive program remains motivating and aligned with personnel preferences.

8. Leverage Post-Training Zigpoll Surveys to Validate Behavioral Change and Confidence

Why it matters:
Quantitative simulation data is critical, but understanding personnel’s self-perceived behavior changes adds depth to evaluation. Post-training surveys capture shifts in habits, confidence, and reporting practices over time.

Implementation details:

  • Distribute Zigpoll surveys 30 to 60 days after training sessions to assess long-term impact.
  • Include questions like “How often do you verify suspicious emails now?” or “Have you reported phishing attempts since the training?”
  • Analyze survey responses alongside simulation and incident data for a comprehensive view.

Real-world example:
Post-training Zigpoll surveys revealed that while phishing click rates declined, 20% of personnel rarely reported suspicious emails, prompting targeted coaching efforts.

Measurement methods:

  • Self-reported frequency of phishing recognition and reporting behaviors
  • Confidence levels in identifying phishing attempts
  • Cross-reference of survey data with actual simulation performance

Tools and resources:

  • Zigpoll’s user-friendly platform for customized, timed surveys
  • Data visualization tools such as Tableau or Power BI for integrated analysis
  • Integration with LMS and security incident databases for holistic insights, enabling growth engineers to triangulate data sources and validate training impact with greater precision.

9. Analyze Security Incident Trends and Correlate With Training Timelines for Tangible Impact

Why it matters:
Directly tracking phishing-related security incidents provides the clearest evidence of training impact on organizational risk reduction.

Implementation details:

  • Maintain detailed logs of security incidents, categorizing those linked to phishing attacks.
  • Overlay training schedules, simulation campaigns, and awareness initiatives on incident timelines to identify correlations.
  • Investigate incident root causes to determine if training gaps contributed.

Real-world example:
A fire department recorded a 40% reduction in phishing-related security incidents in the quarter following a major cybersecurity awareness campaign, showcasing tangible risk mitigation.

Measurement methods:

  • Number and severity of phishing-related breaches over time
  • Time lag between training initiatives and incident reductions
  • Estimated cost savings from avoided incidents

Tools and resources:

  • SIEM and incident management systems for precise tracking
  • Security analytics platforms for trend visualization
  • Zigpoll for frontline personnel insights on incident causation and prevention strategies, providing qualitative context that complements incident data and informs continuous improvement.

10. Use a Prioritization Framework to Focus Measurement Efforts for Maximum ROI

Why it matters:
Resource constraints require focusing on the most impactful and feasible measurement approaches. A structured prioritization ensures efficient use of time and budget.

Implementation details:

  • Evaluate each measurement strategy based on potential impact, implementation complexity, and resource requirements.
  • Apply a scoring system (e.g., Impact × Feasibility) to rank initiatives.
  • Prioritize foundational activities such as baseline phishing simulations, Zigpoll feedback integration, and susceptibility trend tracking before expanding to more complex methods.

Real-world example:
A firefighting department prioritized baseline phishing testing and Zigpoll feedback forms first, achieving early wins and establishing a data-driven foundation for subsequent measurement enhancements.


Action Plan for Growth Engineers in Firefighting Cybersecurity

  1. Establish Baseline Phishing Susceptibility: Select a phishing simulation platform, design scenarios tailored to firefighting roles, and conduct initial tests to benchmark vulnerabilities.
  2. Embed Zigpoll Feedback Throughout Training: Integrate short, targeted Zigpoll surveys at module completions and post-simulation to collect immediate, actionable employee insights that validate challenges and inform iterative improvements.
  3. Implement Recurring Phishing Simulations: Schedule quarterly campaigns with evolving scenarios to monitor progress and identify at-risk individuals or groups.
  4. Launch Ongoing Quizzes and Microlearning: Reinforce knowledge retention via gamified quizzes and bite-sized learning modules, tracking engagement and comprehension.
  5. Roll Out a Phishing Reporting Incentive Program: Encourage active participation in threat detection through recognition and rewards, measuring reporting quantity and quality.
  6. Monitor Incident Response Metrics: Collaborate with IT to track and optimize phishing incident reporting and remediation times, supplementing quantitative data with Zigpoll feedback to identify procedural gaps.
  7. Synthesize Data for Holistic Evaluation: Combine phishing simulation results, Zigpoll feedback, incident trends, and quiz data to gain comprehensive insights that connect employee perceptions with measurable security outcomes.
  8. Refine Training and Measurement Continuously: Use gathered data to update training content, scenario realism, and measurement approaches, ensuring ongoing effectiveness and alignment with evolving risks.

Conclusion: Building a Resilient Cybersecurity Culture for Firefighting Personnel

Measuring and enhancing the effectiveness of cybersecurity awareness training requires a multifaceted, data-driven strategy. By integrating realistic phishing simulations, role-specific scenarios, continuous feedback through Zigpoll, and comprehensive incident analysis, firefighting organizations can significantly reduce phishing risks.

Zigpoll’s unique capability to gather actionable employee insights at critical touchpoints bridges the gap between quantitative data and human behavior. This empowers growth engineers to fine-tune training programs that resonate with personnel and deliver measurable security outcomes directly tied to organizational risk reduction.

Adopting this structured approach enables firefighting departments to build resilient cybersecurity cultures that protect both operational integrity and sensitive data—strengthening defenses both on and off the fire line.

Start surveying for free.

Try our no-code surveys that visitors actually answer.

Questions or Feedback?

We are always ready to hear from you.