Beauty & personal care brands lose track of 51.9% of word-of-mouth sales

Attribution Index September 2026: Beauty & personal care

Skincare, haircare and cosmetics brands, the vertical most exposed to creator-led discovery. This page covers 186,931 post-purchase responses across 190 beauty & personal care merchants, comparing what customers said about how they found a brand against the source each store’s analytics recorded for the same order.

Responses
186,931
Merchants
190
Orders with no tracked source
44.8%
Of those, said “don’t know”
10.4%

Among these merchants, when a customer named word of mouth the source was missing 51.9% of the time. When they named Facebook — a platform that attaches a click identifier to every visit — the figure fell to 31.2%. That is a 1.66× difference within the same set of stores.

How often analytics loses each channel

The share of purchases in this vertical that reached the store’s analytics with no usable source recorded, by the channel the customer named. This is a rate within each channel, not a share of all orders.

Channel Untracked Responses Rate Merchants
YouTube 5,289 8,727 60.6% 61
Word of mouth 13,401 25,834 51.9% 166
TikTok 5,613 11,507 48.8% 92
Creator / influencer 2,475 5,413 45.7% 27
Instagram 25,348 60,984 41.6% 142
Search 8,326 20,254 41.1% 146
Facebook 6,576 21,072 31.2% 103

Channels not shown, because fewer than 25 merchants in this vertical, or fewer than 1,000 responses, stand behind them: Gift (4), Press / editorial (21), Online (unspecified) (5), Email (9), TV (10), Pinterest (10), Retail / in store (21), AI assistant (23), Advertising (unspecified) (6). They exist in the data and are excluded rather than reported thinly.

Method

Merchants were assigned to a vertical from the products appearing on their orders; those whose product mix was ambiguous were excluded rather than assigned. Only responses attached to a completed order are included, collected between 18 September 2025 and 18 September 2026. A vertical is published only where at least 50 merchants contributed, and a channel row within it only where at least 25 of those merchants and 1,000 responses stand behind it. That row threshold is lower than the 50 used on the all-merchant table, because a vertical of this size cannot reach it; every row shows its own merchant count so the difference is visible rather than assumed.

Stores using Zigpoll are not a random sample of beauty & personal care retail, and these figures describe that population rather than the market as a whole. Order values are recorded in their original presentment currency and are not exchange-rate adjusted, which is why no revenue figures appear here. Full method and the all-merchant tables: the Attribution Index.

Citing this

Free to reproduce with attribution (CC BY 4.0).

Zigpoll Attribution Index, September 2026 — Beauty & personal care. 186,931 post-purchase survey responses across 190 beauty & personal care merchants. https://www.zigpoll.com/attribution-index/2026-09/beauty-personal-care

For the underlying tables or a cut not shown here, contact [email protected].

Other verticals

Start collecting feedback in 5 minutes.

Try our no-code surveys that visitors actually answer.

Questions or Feedback?

We are always ready to hear from you.